4 ms·
This is just a bad feminists ant-porn rant. She can't mention porn without bringing in hurting women or sadism. I reject that this has anything useful related t
by zasdffaa 4y ago
This is just a bad feminists ant-porn rant. She can't mention porn without bringing in hurting women or sadism. I reject that this has anything useful related to my question. I reject this view that any but a small minority of men want to see such things.
I ask about affection in sex and you post this?
- frebo 4y agoIt's relevant to your comment - the author is discussing why pornography doesn't depict people enjoying genuine sexual intimacy. Which parts of her essay do you believe are factually or logically incorrect?
- standardUser 4y ago"Most porn is about watching women pretend to enjoy sex acts that are unpleasant to them. It doesn't have to be this way, but it is." It doesn't have to be this way, and it isn't. Amateur porn is on the rise and doesn't fit at all with most of the above anti-porn screed. There's always going to be awful porn, but there seems to be a lot of people who refuse to believe that there is also an near-endless supply homemade and semi-pro porn. It's easy to criticize porn (or anything) if you only look at the worst examples.