4 ms·
You mean the problems are with people who bought their homes because of XYZ, which you now want to change out from under them, even though a PROMISE was made to
by ROTMetro 4y ago
You mean the problems are with people who bought their homes because of XYZ, which you now want to change out from under them, even though a PROMISE was made to those people by the Government in the form of the zoning rules in place. But rules that destroy what made a person's MOST VALUABLE asset VALUABLE to them shouldn't matter if that gets in the way of what YOU WANT, right? Their entire lives should be able to be disrupted, they should be forced from their home, because you no longer want to keep the promise made when they invested THEIR ENTIRE LIFE into their home. You want to move in and change the rules, just like the guy who guy who buys the house next to the airport then tries to get the airport shut down. You do know that you can, like, move to Manhattan, right?
Sorry the little people are getting in the way of this great leap forward you wish to make at their expense.
EDIT: Anyone who wants to force high density housing on others should ONLY be allowed to take vacations on community loving cruise ships. I mean, there is no valid reason to not want to vacation on cruise ships, and by putting all vacationers together it improves efficient, maximizes space, and reduced impact, right? That is the only acceptable vacation.
- bobthepanda 4y agoAll of these rules were put into place in the later half of the 20th century. This is a really recent development in the country’s history. These high density areas, and even many low density areas, have a housing shortage. A lot of the current inflation is being driven by rent. Now grown ups cannot buy homes in communities they’ve grown up in. Is the alternative supposed to be abandoning social networks or living in the streets?