4 ms·

Shite: The little static shite generator from shell

64 points by goranmoomin 4y ago

joshmcmillan 4y ago
That is… a rather unfortunate name.
- htgb 4y ago
  Pretty sure it's in jest! I found the opening paragraphs pretty entertaining (and still clear on what the project does btw).
  - dcow 4y ago
    > Also, I hereby decree that all texsht herein be read in Sean Connery voish. No, this just got serious again XD
- kaashif 4y ago
  At least it's intentional. From the README: > I don't have to give a shite if this little shite maker fails to make your shite work. This only makes sense if they know what "give a shite" means, I think.
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- glouwbug 4y ago
  its painfully obvious that its a joke
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
patleeman 4y ago
From the readme: > I accidentally restarted blogging after a long haitus. Before I could get words into the cloud, I muddled about with "modern" Static Site Generators. Because WordPress is so last century (or so I told myself). Then I got annoyed by the SSG Jamstack bespoke templating building etc. magic. I felt the same way when I restarted my blog so I went a similar route, but... lazier. I'm using pandoc with some shell scripts gluing it all together and it works.. pretty well actually. https://github.com/patleeman/patricklee.nyc https://github.com/patleeman/patricklee.nyc
- BrandoElFollito 4y ago
  I tried a few entries from your blog (really interesting btw) and at one point you write > Walking can be distracting in meetings. Interestingly enough, I have the exact opposite - the more I concentrate on a discussion, the more I have to walk. This is easy with remote work, I walk in my apartment. People got used to the fact that I suddenly disappear from the video ( a rather good sign :)), I usually do not even realize that I got up. On the office everyone is seated except for me who is standing up and silently trotting around. Of course I only do it with people who are fine with that.
bradley_taunt 4y ago
Reminds me of my recent creation of a Pandoc based SSG that I use for my personal website. https://pblog.xyz/ https://pblog.xyz/
cutler 4y ago
For all the modern static site generators with their funky Javascript I still find Perl's Template::Toolkit to be the best SSG I've ever used.
dusted 4y ago
Static sites.. Combining the worst parts of static site user experience[1] with the worst parts of dynamic site administration[2]. [1] None of the potential benefits of a dynamic site, like searching and interactivity (not that they are always needed, but that IS the few things that dynamic sites are actually good for). [2] Instead of the end-deliverable files, which are forever and have zero dependencies (like a true static site), you get additional infrastructure dependencies like you do on a dynamic site (your generator tool, simple as it may be, still has more dependencies than zero, it is, at the very least, a dependency in and of itself).
Aleksdev 4y ago
Interesting name..
pydry 4y ago
It's weird there seem to be about 2-300 static site generators out there, but it's rare that somebody makes one with a decent theme. Even rarer to have a couple. I find even the most popular ones are often lacking themes. Worse, sometimes they advertise themes but the themes and the SSG dont work together. When I discovered this I was initially tempted to build my own but then decided I didnt want to be the 301st. So far ive settled on mkdocs which I like although Ive tried about 5 of the others which I had irritating issues with.

64 points by goranmoomin 4y ago

joshmcmillan 4y ago

That is… a rather unfortunate name.

htgb 4y ago
Pretty sure it's in jest! I found the opening paragraphs pretty entertaining (and still clear on what the project does btw).
- dcow 4y ago
  > Also, I hereby decree that all texsht herein be read in Sean Connery voish. No, this just got serious again XD
kaashif 4y ago
At least it's intentional. From the README: > I don't have to give a shite if this little shite maker fails to make your shite work. This only makes sense if they know what "give a shite" means, I think.
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
glouwbug 4y ago
its painfully obvious that its a joke

deleted 4y ago

[deleted]

patleeman 4y ago

From the readme: > I accidentally restarted blogging after a long haitus. Before I could get words into the cloud, I muddled about with "modern" Static Site Generators. Because WordPress is so last century (or so I told myself). Then I got annoyed by the SSG Jamstack bespoke templating building etc. magic. I felt the same way when I restarted my blog so I went a similar route, but... lazier. I'm using pandoc with some shell scripts gluing it all together and it works.. pretty well actually. https://github.com/patleeman/patricklee.nyc https://github.com/patleeman/patricklee.nyc

BrandoElFollito 4y ago
I tried a few entries from your blog (really interesting btw) and at one point you write > Walking can be distracting in meetings. Interestingly enough, I have the exact opposite - the more I concentrate on a discussion, the more I have to walk. This is easy with remote work, I walk in my apartment. People got used to the fact that I suddenly disappear from the video ( a rather good sign :)), I usually do not even realize that I got up. On the office everyone is seated except for me who is standing up and silently trotting around. Of course I only do it with people who are fine with that.

bradley_taunt 4y ago

Reminds me of my recent creation of a Pandoc based SSG that I use for my personal website. https://pblog.xyz/ https://pblog.xyz/

cutler 4y ago

For all the modern static site generators with their funky Javascript I still find Perl's Template::Toolkit to be the best SSG I've ever used.

dusted 4y ago

Static sites.. Combining the worst parts of static site user experience[1] with the worst parts of dynamic site administration[2]. [1] None of the potential benefits of a dynamic site, like searching and interactivity (not that they are always needed, but that IS the few things that dynamic sites are actually good for). [2] Instead of the end-deliverable files, which are forever and have zero dependencies (like a true static site), you get additional infrastructure dependencies like you do on a dynamic site (your generator tool, simple as it may be, still has more dependencies than zero, it is, at the very least, a dependency in and of itself).

Aleksdev 4y ago

Interesting name..

pydry 4y ago

It's weird there seem to be about 2-300 static site generators out there, but it's rare that somebody makes one with a decent theme. Even rarer to have a couple. I find even the most popular ones are often lacking themes. Worse, sometimes they advertise themes but the themes and the SSG dont work together. When I discovered this I was initially tempted to build my own but then decided I didnt want to be the 301st. So far ive settled on mkdocs which I like although Ive tried about 5 of the others which I had irritating issues with.