I've seen a few examples of TDD that, like you say, offer a very clear benefit for writing your logic and making sure you're covering your bases. However, they

I've seen a few examples of TDD that, like you say, offer a very clear benefit for writing your logic and making sure you're covering your bases. However, they feel as though you're going around your ass to get to your elbow. I'm still a very firm believer that you should be created your code base with being able to write proper testing in mind (separation of concerns, IOC/DI, etc), however I would be lying if I said that pure, evangelist style TDD was my cup of tea. But TDD can be one of those religious style debates that I typically like to avoid...