3 ms·

Your (bizarre) original comment was that the whistleblower should be just as worried about Ukraine coming after them. I pointed out the obvious error in this th

by Gatsky 4y ago

Your (bizarre) original comment was that the whistleblower should be just as worried about Ukraine coming after them. I pointed out the obvious error in this thinking, since Russia is a vicious and vindictive regime with no equal. Now you are talking about something completely different, an equally bizarre anti-Zelensky bugbear. One must question your motivation for making these comments.

verisimi 4y ago
It's not bizarre to you to say 'Russia is vicious and vindictive with no equal', as if its a dog or psychopathic nutcase. As if an imagined fiction (government) can have some sort of inhuman motivations. (You know governments aren't really alive, that they don't think or act, except in the way that they are manipulated to do so by those who hold the levers power, and then by those who follow their orders, right? Its nothing except an idea, really a manipulation..) No, believing in 'Vindictive Russia' is perfectly normal, not bizarre at all. But to you, it is bizarre that I point out that Zelensky has dodgy financial dealings, and that this might be a motivation for his actions. These dealings can be verified in the Panama papers and are not in dispute. This is not information with any merit to you, apparently. And you appear to entirely ignore the point I make about the free press failing to report this information. Is there any doubt that free press is actually a public relations/messaging tool again used by those holding the levers of power, rather than faithfully relaying salient information to provide us with a full picture? No, there is no doubt.
- Gatsky 4y ago
  Suggest you read my comment properly. I said the Russian regime is vindictive, not Russia. Characterising the Russian regime as a psychopathic nutcase would be more correct than a government, although as we have seen from their shambolic military it is probably more correct to say they are not coherently anything at all.

by Gatsky 4y ago

verisimi 4y ago

It's not bizarre to you to say 'Russia is vicious and vindictive with no equal', as if its a dog or psychopathic nutcase. As if an imagined fiction (government) can have some sort of inhuman motivations. (You know governments aren't really alive, that they don't think or act, except in the way that they are manipulated to do so by those who hold the levers power, and then by those who follow their orders, right? Its nothing except an idea, really a manipulation..) No, believing in 'Vindictive Russia' is perfectly normal, not bizarre at all. But to you, it is bizarre that I point out that Zelensky has dodgy financial dealings, and that this might be a motivation for his actions. These dealings can be verified in the Panama papers and are not in dispute. This is not information with any merit to you, apparently. And you appear to entirely ignore the point I make about the free press failing to report this information. Is there any doubt that free press is actually a public relations/messaging tool again used by those holding the levers of power, rather than faithfully relaying salient information to provide us with a full picture? No, there is no doubt.

Gatsky 4y ago
Suggest you read my comment properly. I said the Russian regime is vindictive, not Russia. Characterising the Russian regime as a psychopathic nutcase would be more correct than a government, although as we have seen from their shambolic military it is probably more correct to say they are not coherently anything at all.