4 ms·

> We have nothing to do with the robot Is that not an explicit diversion of responsibility? They allowed the robot to operate at their event. I might buy a mis

by drew-y 4y ago

> We have nothing to do with the robot Is that not an explicit diversion of responsibility? They allowed the robot to operate at their event. I might buy a mistranslation, but seems like a stretch. I come from 8 years of experience in industrial robotics. That the boy triggered a “bug” is irrelevant. It's a distraction. The bug isn't the issue here. This kind of robot should not have been used in the first place. That is my point.

foverzar 4y ago
> That the boy triggered a “bug” is irrelevant. Why? How are you going to fix it then? > This kind of robot should not have been used in the first place. That is my point. Please, open your favorite search engine, find images for "chess robot" and tell me how the whole humanity had managed to fail in designing a default chess robot. In any case, seems like we won't be seeing any chess robots in Russia anymore, which would be stupid as hell.