> Now show me list of the 8 million people who die per year from air pollution. Are you comparing to coal-fired plants? I'm talking about solar and wind. As f

> Now show me list of the 8 million people who die per year from air pollution. Are you comparing to coal-fired plants? I'm talking about solar and wind. As for fossil fuels, the expected deaths and environmental from nuclear accidents are - well, TBH, I don't know the math for that, but I would expect it would be on the order of magnitude of the extra deaths from fossil fuel electricity generation. > I mentioned the solutions I will actually look into that. However, the website says: "Finland ... No other country has yet reached the implementation phase of final disposal. ... final disposal of high-level spent nuclear fuel has not yet been launched anywhere." So, that's not what's being used so far. This company's new approach - maybe it's great, I don't know, but it needs to last thousands of years, right? That's a very high bar - and a significant maintenance and hazard-management burden going forward. > Lazard are a bunch of kooks. That's a pretty strong claim. But - since I'm not an expert, I can't outright dismiss it. They're a popular source for a "bunch of kooks"... care to elaborate? > Look at Hualong One costs. I would look into them, if I could.