3 ms·
A friendly reminder that the idea posed by a pioneer of nuclear energy of just dumping big bombs in a hole and harvesting the heat energy with steam/plasma has
by dogcomplex 4y ago
A friendly reminder that the idea posed by a pioneer of nuclear energy of just dumping big bombs in a hole and harvesting the heat energy with steam/plasma has never been invalidated and remains the most efficiently-simple solution immediately viable
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_PACER https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_PACER
If containment is your concern (though underground blast effects are decently understood, and blast chambers could be constructed with still strongly net economic/energy positive) - this does not need to be built around any population centers. At a cost of 1.5% efficiency loss per 1000 km, UHV power lines can direct it from a single write-off location anywhere on earth. That single location can likely be scaled to supply well beyond the total current global energy production.
https://en.geidco.org.cn/aboutgei/uhv/ https://en.geidco.org.cn/aboutgei/uhv/
- brtkdotse 4y agoLmao, that sounds like something straight out of Futurama. The Wikipedia article you liked says it “economically unviable”, but fails to provide a source
- therealdrag0 4y agoWhat about earth quakes? (I didn’t click the links)
- lostmsu 4y agoAnother no container idea (this one is crazy): just blow them in the ocean, that will evaporate some water and speed up evaporation of some more. Harvest energy with existing hydroelectric setuos once it passes the weather cycle.
- willis936 4y agoThere are much less ecologically disastrous and less illegal cloud-seeding techniques. They're still very illegal though. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_seeding https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_seeding