3 ms·

If I say "you distribute revenge porn" Twitter doesn't say that, it's, again, pretty clearly spelled out in the policy. The leap from 'our system thinks this l

by pvg 4y ago

If I say "you distribute revenge porn" Twitter doesn't say that, it's, again, pretty clearly spelled out in the policy. The leap from 'our system thinks this looks like revenge porn' to 'you are accused of a crime' doesn't seem to be based on anything beyond umbrage and repetition. Neither of these things make it true, though.

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
Groxx 4y ago
If the system went from "our system thinks this looks like revenge porn" to "we are sending you a warning in case you are, verify that you are not doing it or change your actions immediately. you may be banned on review if it appears you did" I think you might be right. But that's not happening. It goes from "our system thinks this looks like revenge porn" to "you are banned". And even "we double checked, you are banned". If Best Buy said "your actions seem similar to thieves" and kicked you out and banned you while quoting theft laws, without checking if you had stolen something, yes. I would say they were accusing you of theft, because they are acting as if you did. Actions can accuse as well.
- pvg 4y ago
  The account was suspended and, again, the policy, which you should read, makes it pretty clear that you can be suspended for Twitter being wrong about your post. It takes a lot of implicit extrapolations ('revenge porn', a term they don't use, 'banned', a thing they don't actually do in those cases, etc) to get to 'accused of a crime'. And they aren't in the thing.
  - soraminazuki 4y ago
    Using a synonym isn't an "implicit extrapolation." > 'revenge porn', a term they don't use Again, "non-consentual nudity" means revenge porn. https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/intimate-media https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/intimate-medi... > 'banned', a thing they don't actually do in those cases They "suspended" the account and haven't reversed it. Basically the same thing. Please, repeating a claim over and over doesn't make it any more true.

by pvg 4y ago

deleted 4y ago

[deleted]

deleted 4y ago

[deleted]

Groxx 4y ago

If the system went from "our system thinks this looks like revenge porn" to "we are sending you a warning in case you are, verify that you are not doing it or change your actions immediately. you may be banned on review if it appears you did" I think you might be right. But that's not happening. It goes from "our system thinks this looks like revenge porn" to "you are banned". And even "we double checked, you are banned". If Best Buy said "your actions seem similar to thieves" and kicked you out and banned you while quoting theft laws, without checking if you had stolen something, yes. I would say they were accusing you of theft, because they are acting as if you did. Actions can accuse as well.

pvg 4y ago
The account was suspended and, again, the policy, which you should read, makes it pretty clear that you can be suspended for Twitter being wrong about your post. It takes a lot of implicit extrapolations ('revenge porn', a term they don't use, 'banned', a thing they don't actually do in those cases, etc) to get to 'accused of a crime'. And they aren't in the thing.
- soraminazuki 4y ago
  Using a synonym isn't an "implicit extrapolation." > 'revenge porn', a term they don't use Again, "non-consentual nudity" means revenge porn. https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/intimate-media https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/intimate-medi... > 'banned', a thing they don't actually do in those cases They "suspended" the account and haven't reversed it. Basically the same thing. Please, repeating a claim over and over doesn't make it any more true.