3 ms·
If you add district heating to LWRs their effective efficiency goes from 33% to over 57%. If we adjust markets to value on-demand (including nights/weekends/win
by acidburnNSA 4y ago
If you add district heating to LWRs their effective efficiency goes from 33% to over 57%. If we adjust markets to value on-demand (including nights/weekends/winters) low-carbon heat and electricity, LWR economics would be good, even in the USA.
They're already expected to be essential for decarbonizing at scale.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542435118303866 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S254243511...
I have plenty of rants about how LCOE is wholly inappropriate as a metric of overall decarbonized system costs. If you look from that perspective, LWRs built by Koreans, Chinese, Indians, or Russians are an incredible deal.
We just need to have the Koreans come over and re-teach us how to build reactors. It's beautifully symmetric because we originally taught them. They've perfected the knowledge, enhanced it, saved it, and can now teach us.
- adgjlsfhk1 4y agoThat is probably a good idea, but comes with the major political problem of putting nuclear reactors very close to large populations of people who can complain about the zoning.
- acidburnNSA 4y ago100 km isn't that close. https://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/workshops/nucogen/presentations/4_Safa_Economics-District-Heating-Light.pdf https://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/workshops/nucogen/presentations...
- adgjlsfhk1 4y agoWow, point retracted. I'm honestly kind of shocked that heat can be transferred that efficiently.