3 ms·
You left out the fact that JK rejected the notion of a world teacher and disbanded that particular association. He also rejected theosophy as a whole, and any o
by 1sembiyan 4y ago
You left out the fact that JK rejected the notion of a world teacher and disbanded that particular association. He also rejected theosophy as a whole, and any organization that claims to know any such thing as a “Truth”.
It’s interesting that he would reject the money and power that came with it just because he didn’t believe in it. Most godmen and “spiritual entrepreneurs” wouldn’t.
- AareyBaba 4y agoNevertheless, his writings are incoherent word soups and an utter waste of time.
- pmoriarty 4y agoJust because you can't comprehend something doesn't mean that no one can.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- 1sembiyan 4y agoI can’t get into his writings, but I know others that do (and I am not talking about Naval Ravikant). So a waste of just our time, perhaps, and yet cannot be dismissed.
- marc_io 4y agoThis lack of clarity in Krishnamurti's material was recognized even by David Bohm himself [1], but he also claimed that K made a great contribution to the study of consciousness. See David Moody's The Unconditioned Mind, chapter 15.