18 ms·
Glucose index effect can play a large role in weight gain and retention. A lot of the NSS products have a worse GI effect than straight cane sugar, especially t
by andrew_ 4y ago
Glucose index effect can play a large role in weight gain and retention. A lot of the NSS products have a worse GI effect than straight cane sugar, especially the sugar alcohols.
- riku_iki 4y agoCan you support your claim by any evidence? Stevia for example has 0 GI, while sugar has 80 GI: https://www.va.gov/WHOLEHEALTHLIBRARY/docs/Understanding-Sweeteners-508.pdf https://www.va.gov/WHOLEHEALTHLIBRARY/docs/Understanding-Swe...
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- tpush 4y agoI don't think there's any robust evidence for glycemic index/load mattering at all, unless you're diabetic of course.
- icelancer 4y agoIn fact most of the evidence actually supports the opposite hypothesis: It really doesn't matter.
- gruez 4y agosource? I always vaguely thought that high GI foods were bad because it would stress out your pancreas and lead to pre-diabetes.
- stjohnswarts 4y agoI think you better do some more reading if you think stressing your insulin mechanism daily with far more sugar than humans evolved to partake of is "ok". There's pretty good evidence for 30-35% of humans not handling it well at all...
- Someone1234 4y agoI looked it up and: - Aspartame Glycemic Index 0 - Stevia Glycemic Index 0 - Sucralose Glycemic Index 0 - Allulose Glycemic Index 0 What are you trying to claim here?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]