> It's very annoying that git became more popular, it's such a disaster from the usability point of view. I don't understand this sort of comment at all. What'

> It's very annoying that git became more popular, it's such a disaster from the usability point of view. I don't understand this sort of comment at all. What's so hard about git? You clone a repository, you checkout a branch, you pull changes to that branch from the remote server, you commit a change to your local repository, you push those changes to a remote server. What's so hard to get? It's even more absurd when people try to claim that mercurial is so clear while criticising git for being unintelligible, when mercurial follows the exact same patterns but had to confuse people by leaving basic features like stashing as an afterthought to be implemented with ad-hoc extensions.