I partially agree with some points, personally I see the social part only solvable with two separate life, one in person, local, another remote. The issue here

I partially agree with some points, personally I see the social part only solvable with two separate life, one in person, local, another remote. The issue here is that locally we often have not much matching people: if we work together probably we share some interests, ideas, ... if we simply live nearby we might be TOTALLY different witch might be very good for certain activities but not for others. Long story short: IMO, so far, WFH is mostly chosen by skilled people and since they are a minority it's hard to find matches outside restricted areas like universities and some companies HQs... That's NOT a WFH issue, but a social one. That's can only be solved after a significant amount of time. That's means: now many try to relocate to nice places for climate, nature, leisure, ... and so far it's a virgin territory. After a decade or more, like we have "good" and "poor/bad" neighborhoods in cities now we will find "WFH places" where people match enough to satisfy the physical proximity need. The issue is that such process is long and hard, but I see no other evolutions so far...