5 ms·
> The flagged post was reviewed by two humans. How do you know? I wouldn't be surprised in the appeals are automated too, especially the initial ones.
by tablespoon 4y ago
> The flagged post was reviewed by two humans.
How do you know? I wouldn't be surprised in the appeals are automated too, especially the initial ones.
- rpdillon 4y agoHaving ML handle appeals strikes me as implausible, but possible.
- tablespoon 4y agoI guess the question is "is it Twitter's goal to have the appeals process work, or just exist?" If they have some dumb automation that just rejects most initial attempts, it could discourage their users to the point where they can employ a much smaller staff to handle the appeals. Especially if the sanction can be solved by the user just deleting the content.
- rpdillon 4y agoI'll admit that my initial comment was somewhat biased coming from another thread in this discussion discussing verbal abuse of the moderation team. In that context, my assumption was that they were human, naturally. Your point is fair, though, especially considering Twitter's scale.