28 ms·
> Dreamweaver was good 19 years ago and remains good today. Notepad.exe was good 19 years ago. Dreamweaver? Not so much. :)
by tailspin2019 4y ago
> Dreamweaver was good 19 years ago and remains good today.
Notepad.exe was good 19 years ago.
Dreamweaver? Not so much.
:)
- bilekas 4y agoDreamweaver was a good idea, but impossible for them to maintain. In my experience it was regularly giving bad results. It was a great tool for learning HTML and CSS though, but mainly because you would always end up just going into the source to fix it and view in DW. I would be very nervous of anyone using it these days for anything else.
- danielvaughn 4y agoI'm actually curious to see what Dreamweaver looks like these days, because I just recently found out that it's still around. I haven't seen it since like 2009 and I honestly thought it had been shut down.
- marc_io 4y agoIt's still around, but it's no longer being improved, just getting maintenance. Most of the people involved with it migrated elsewhere. Most who used Dreamweaver and relied on its extensions are now using another similar app called Wappler.
- doodlesdev 4y agoFor those that are into Bootstrap then Bootstrap Studio is also a good option which I found produces pretty decent results.
- rchaud 4y agoYep, I'm a fan of Bootstrap Studio, if for nothing else than the fact that it's not a subscription product.