4 ms·
> huge risk to rely on any other country though, friends today may become enemies tomorrow. Real life isn't some RTS game. If a flip like that happens, it won
by tablespoon 4y ago
> huge risk to rely on any other country though, friends today may become enemies tomorrow.
Real life isn't some RTS game. If a flip like that happens, it won't happen very quickly.
Also autarky isn't even possible for most countries, and is probably a weakness for most of those that could pull it off.
> Have we already forgotten that US dropped atomic weapons on Japan yet are now fast allies...
That's an example of an enemy becoming an ally, so not exactly relevant.
> or that US supported the Islamic fundamentalism in Afganistan before now becoming enemies. US + Saddam bosom buddies in the Iran vs Iraq war.
Those are allies of geopolitical necessity, not "ideologically-aligned natural allies." For the latter, I'm thinking of things like NATO (maybe sans a couple of members) and "the Anglosphere."
- hunglee2 4y agoEngland + settler colonies then? Fair enough if that is your view, but at least own it
- tablespoon 4y ago> England + settler colonies then? No, obviously not. I gave examples, and even one of those was broader than that. > Fair enough if that is your view, but at least own it Why would I "own" your straw man's view?