2 ms·
“All this info should be freely available” and “all this info increases crag crowding” are both common complaints about Mountain Project, but they’re mutually e
by snowwrestler 4y ago
“All this info should be freely available” and “all this info increases crag crowding” are both common complaints about Mountain Project, but they’re mutually exclusive. A person who is angry about crowding is not likely to support Open Beta either.
I will say that the idea that route info should be freely available is not rooted in history of the climbing community. For many decades the primary way to get info (aside from asking around) was to buy guidebooks that other climbers researched and published. Making money off route info has a long tradition.
And the core tradition of climbing competence is to just show up and climb what you see. This is why flash and onsight climbs are highly regarded even on sport routes with permanent draws. Free access to route beta is not essential for climbing.
I certainly don’t object to Open Beta but I think some of the complaints about MP are a bit overwrought.
- rockingclimber 4y ago> Free access to route beta is not essential for climbing. Viet Nguyen, OpenBeta's founder here. As mentioned in my post above, besides climbing, many of us are hackers and data nerds. All we wanted is to be able to access and tinker with the community-generated climbing data to make maps of climbing walls, study Python Pandas and recommendation engines, etc. Open access to climbing data doesn’t have to be about the physical aspects of climbing, for the same reason open source enthusiasts wanting to have access to the source code. It doesn't mean we're not supporting commercial derivative of a project.