4 ms·
"you cannot be unsuspended until either they agree your appeal is correct (which it is), you give up your appeal (never), and/or delete the offending tweet." D
by philipswood 4y ago
"you cannot be unsuspended until either they agree your appeal is correct (which it is), you give up your appeal (never), and/or delete the offending tweet."
Delete the offending tweet.
- dqpb 4y agoImpossible for someone with a spine.
- MikeDelta 4y agoJust speculating (I hope) but curious what others think. Say that a video is flagged, user gets the above response and user simply deletes the video. To me it feels like an implicit admission, not having any additional information like "you were right, sorry" or "it is totally incorrect but easier to do this than to fight it". And say only this metadata is stored, not the video itself, it becomes impossible to judge afterwards. And say once in a while these logs are reviewed by another party (law enforcement perhaps). Might that be sufficient to end up one some kind of watch list?
- Thorrez 4y agoThe author doesn't mention this in the article, but I think deleting the tweet requires you to acknowledge that it broke the rules: https://twitter.com/Raddagher/status/1533326201602707458/photo/2 https://twitter.com/Raddagher/status/1533326201602707458/pho... Which in this case I think would be a lie. Yes I agree the author should be less prideful and not call Twitter employees "dense" in an appeal. But I don't think the solution is to say the author should lie and say the tweet did break the rules. Or maybe the rules could be interpreted as "anything that Twitter says breaks the rules does break the rules", meaning it wouldn't be a lie to acknowledge the tweet broke the rules. I haven't analyzed the rules closely.