2 ms·
Of course it’s mot a duck, because we have an objective definition of duck.
by dcow 4y ago
Of course it’s mot a duck, because we have an objective definition of duck.
- smolder 4y agoRight. Maybe if we had a down-to-the-atom perfect simulation of a duck, you could argue that it's a duck in another state of being. With the AI this deranged engineer decided to call sentient, we have the equivalent of a quacking simulator, not a full duck simulator or even a partial one. It is not thinking. It has nothing like a brain nor the essential components of thought.