>This is a option that shouldn't be discounted. Why not? In all of the material that you and GP link to, it is said that CLODO was last active in the 80's and

>This is a option that shouldn't be discounted. Why not? In all of the material that you and GP link to, it is said that CLODO was last active in the 80's and then vanished, never to be heard from again. That's over 30 years of apparent inactivity. There are some coincidences between the target and CLODO's previous targets, but... that's it. Edit: From Wikipedia... >Since December, 1983, CLODO has no longer been classified as 'active' by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. So, forty years, not thirty.