4 ms·
> You cannot possibly be this dense. Who is the dense one here? You just insulted a person who has to look at a million of these, and had absolutely nothing to
by bryan0 4y ago
> You cannot possibly be this dense.
Who is the dense one here? You just insulted a person who has to look at a million of these, and had absolutely nothing to do with the misclassification, and then you’re surprised when they rejected your appeal. Remember there are actual people reading your words (at least for now)
- aendruk 4y ago“You” is Twitter
- SZJX 4y agoExactly. I can’t believe so many commentators here (and maybe the employee who reviewed the request, maybe not) missed this simple point and turn the heat on the author instead. A shame that English doesn’t distinguish between the singular and plural forms of “you” I guess?
- TheRealPomax 4y agoYeah, heaven forbid you follow you company's policies as outlined for the appeal process, better to power-trip because someone who was banned from the platform, the harshest punishment your company has, is fully-expectedly-vocal about being mistreated.
- saghm 4y agoIdk, this feels like a bit of a double standard. Either being mistreated justifies bad behavior, or it doesn't. If it justifies insulting a customer service rep who didn't personally ban you in the first place, then that rep upholding your ban due to being unnecessarily aggressive is justified too.
- rpdillon 4y agoTwitter moderators are acting in a professional capacity, representing Twitter. In my mind, there really is a (justifiable) double standard.
- Kalium 4y agoThis is a great illustration of why appeals processes are often not taken very seriously. Generally they're used to re-litigate the issue by people who do not even consider the possibility that they may have violated policies. The insults are just the icing on the cake. Basically, the real people involved know that appeals processes are going to be subject to vast quantities of what amounts to spam.