3 ms·
Is that an argument that they shouldn't do it then? Because right now, if this article is to be believed, they don't do manual review even on appeals. That's ob
by gambiting 4y ago
Is that an argument that they shouldn't do it then? Because right now, if this article is to be believed, they don't do manual review even on appeals. That's obviously not ok.
- Kalium 4y agoAs other commenters point out, that characterization is not not accurate. There were most definitely humans involved, including on appeal. Does that make things OK? I suppose that depends on whether you object more to the decision or the process.