4 ms·
It couldn't, but what all of these companies could absolutely do is pair automated moderation with human review. When AI flags something as innapropriate, a hum
by gambiting 4y ago
It couldn't, but what all of these companies could absolutely do is pair automated moderation with human review. When AI flags something as innapropriate, a human has to sign it off before it's removed or the account suspended.
The only exception for it is when content matches a known hash for illegal content - then it should be removed automatically.
- ISL 4y agoHow many automated-review actions do you think Twitter performs in a day that would require such a review? How many seconds might each human-review take? What false-positive rate is acceptable on that human-review?
- gambiting 4y agoIs that an argument that they shouldn't do it then? Because right now, if this article is to be believed, they don't do manual review even on appeals. That's obviously not ok.
- Kalium 4y agoAs other commenters point out, that characterization is not not accurate. There were most definitely humans involved, including on appeal. Does that make things OK? I suppose that depends on whether you object more to the decision or the process.