4 ms·
Companies play by the rule "better sorry than safe" but force their users to play by "better safe than sorry". As others have mentioned, they main issue is not
by TrianguloY 4y ago
Companies play by the rule "better sorry than safe" but force their users to play by "better safe than sorry".
As others have mentioned, they main issue is not the autobanning (it sure is a false positive, those things inevitable happens on mass-scale products) but the appeal rejection that fails to detect it.
- vintermann 4y agoBut they aren't sorry either. This guy appealed, and if a human at Twitter ever saw it, it was probably some overworked contractor who gets a strike for every appeal he lets through.
- TrianguloY 4y agoIf this gets enough traction they will be on a few days (or at least they will revert the ban). It's sad.
- nullc 4y agoYep-- if the appeal hit a human and got a quick "oops" sorry! that would be another matter entirely. I wonder if they're using their obviously invalid "appeals" results to train the AI? ... so as time goes on it just gets dumber and dumber.