3 ms·
Hillary Clinton hadn't received an order from congress to preserve evidence in an ongoing investigation.
by FranksTV 4y ago
Hillary Clinton hadn't received an order from congress to preserve evidence in an ongoing investigation.
- tunap 4y agoUm, using a private server for official correspondences doesn't really require a subpoena to be illegal. GW had one, and his Admin said he was going to be murdered shortly before his private plane crashed. Nothing new here. Politics, as usual.
- bediger4000 4y agoDidn't Trump people use private servers, too? I mean, if we're both sidesing it, let's be consistent.
- tunap 4y agoHow is calling out Hillay AND GW "sidesing"? See how narrow your focus is? It's not your fault, we're all served Kool-Aid every day. YOU may choose to drink it or not.
- bediger4000 4y agoSo we must both sides if Trump is wrong (so as to excuse his behavior) but not both sides to excuse other's behavior? Help me out here, just trying to understand how and when I'm expected to both sides an issue
- jimmygrapes 4y agoI feel like this is bait, but I'm taking anyway. Order from Congress, no, you're correct; but ordered by a federal judge: https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?161905 https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?161905 It's not pay walled, per se. PACER is free up to a number of requests. If you don't have an account, make one. If you don't want to put forth that effort, then you are most certainly arguing in partisan and uninformed bad faith. I was going to link a free copy, before I realized the aforementioned bait.