3 ms·

This is a option that shouldn't be discounted. Listened to the excellent Popular Front podcast on CLODO (https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-anti-tech-mil

This is a option that shouldn't be discounted. Listened to the excellent Popular Front podcast on CLODO (https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-anti-tech-militants-who-never-got-caught/id1364539980?i=1000564631523 https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-anti-tech-militant...). These were very sophisticated, probably computer scientists themselves who were horrified at how the tech would be used and sabotaged a lot of the infrastructure. Seemingly just to make a point in the history books that the way things went was not without resistance.

jjulius 4y ago
>This is a option that shouldn't be discounted. Why not? In all of the material that you and GP link to, it is said that CLODO was last active in the 80's and then vanished, never to be heard from again. That's over 30 years of apparent inactivity. There are some coincidences between the target and CLODO's previous targets, but... that's it. Edit: From Wikipedia... >Since December, 1983, CLODO has no longer been classified as 'active' by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. So, forty years, not thirty.