5 ms·
At that time QL Sinclair was a loser. A good computer that never got programs. It was the computer of Lius Torwalds and the reason he had to write himself progr
by reacweb 4y ago
At that time QL Sinclair was a loser. A good computer that never got programs. It was the computer of Lius Torwalds and the reason he had to write himself programs. Without QL Sinclair, we may never had Linux.
At my work, I was present when the research on ASAS (https://skybrary.aero/articles/airborne-separation-assurance-systems-asas https://skybrary.aero/articles/airborne-separation-assurance...) led to the idea of PMS (https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/2021-05/eurocontrol-point-merge-guide-v1-4.pdf https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/2021-05/euro...).
Never underestimate serendipity
- jchw 4y agoWhile that's a neat story, I'm not sure if it has a lot to do with the practical applicability of quantum computing. I didn't mean to single out Commodore or their CBM64, I really mean to say that there are plenty of examples of entire technologies that were hyped and then flopped, not just market competitors in a given technology that is already mostly proven.
- einpoklum 4y ago> we may never [have] had Linux. Oh, come on. Linux was a clone of MINIX with a GPL license. If Linus had not written it, somebody else would have; and at worst (if that is worse), we would have all been running FreeBSD now.
- Ekaros 4y agoOr maybe someone would have come up with something that wasn't Unix clone... Maybe our computing would be in better shape.