4 ms·
As entry size grows different parts of the engine are under pressure, allocation-wise and i/o-wise. AFAIK memcached isn't advised entries above 1 MiB. We can
by shin_lao 15y ago
As entry size grows different parts of the engine are under pressure, allocation-wise and i/o-wise.
AFAIK memcached isn't advised entries above 1 MiB.
We can maintain performance for entries as large as 200 MiB (provided that you have enough memory) but it cost us a lot of sweat!
We haven't benchmarked for larger entries as we weren't sure it would make much sense.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- techscruggs 15y agoWith values that large, have you considered using membase?
- shin_lao 15y agoThe performances I'm talking for large entries are for our engine "wrpme", not for memcached, I realize it wasn't clear in my post and I can't edit it anymore, sorry about that.