> I lost interest in the question of its sentience when I saw Lemoine conveniently side-step its unresponsive reply Do you realize that you're holding it to a

> I lost interest in the question of its sentience when I saw Lemoine conveniently side-step its unresponsive reply Do you realize that you're holding it to a higher standard than humans here? A single poorly handled response to a question can't be the test. I doubt the sentience too, but it also occurs to me that pretty much no one has been able to come up with a rock solid definition of sentience, nor a test. Until we do those things, what could make anyone so confident either way?