4 ms·
The manufacturer reused identifiers (5 to be precise) in a later batch. This was a manufacturing error rather than a freak collision. Edit: Source https://www
by arecurrence 4y ago
The manufacturer reused identifiers (5 to be precise) in a later batch. This was a manufacturing error rather than a freak collision.
Edit: Source https://www.thedailystar.net/business/news/two-containers-same-number-arrive-ctg-port-3076171 https://www.thedailystar.net/business/news/two-containers-sa...
"Five containers of the second batch have numbers akin to another five belonging to the previous batch, according to Borhan."
- Pxtl 4y agoWhenever I see somebody detailing the scope of a mistake at their business, I mentality add the words "at least" to any quantities.
- bee_rider 4y agoI add it to the person instead. "Five containers of the second batch have numbers akin to another five belonging to the previous batch, according to Borhan, at least." This is much more reassuring because it just looks like Borhan needs to get his shit together. Optimism!