4 ms·
Well, to be perfectly honest, well-engineered projects manage rivers in the US as well - e.g. the system of locks and dams all along the Mississippi courtesy of
by WkndTriathlete 4y ago
Well, to be perfectly honest, well-engineered projects manage rivers in the US as well - e.g. the system of locks and dams all along the Mississippi courtesy of the US Army Corps of Engineers.
The two big problems with the management of the Colorado River water are big disincentives not to lose legal water rights, resulting in farmers growing water-hungry crops in the desert just to preserve those rights; and water allocations that were larger than even optimistic Colorado River flow rates during a very wet season in the 1930s. In order to preserve the river basin and reservoirs, both of those issues have to be addressed, concurrently, and there are a lot of stakeholders that are going to be very angry about whatever solution is proposed to them (or imposed on them very soon, out of necessity, to keep the lights on.)
- jacquesm 4y agoWell, they might want to have their cake and eat it and find themselves without cake at all. That's mostly a matter of time at this point and irrigation for crops is secondary to drinking water.
- Ekaros 4y agoOn other hand moving people is much simpler than moving crop land... So why shouldn't the people be ones to move?
- jacquesm 4y agoOh they will move. Just not voluntarily, but move they will. That's one of the biggest effects of all this climate stuff: people will end up displaced. Millions / year already.