3 ms·
Per the USGS gauge[1], the current flows are 21.3 cubic feet per second. The historical low for July 22 is from 1980 when it was 60.0. The flows of the Rio Gran
by ccooffee 4y ago
Per the USGS gauge[1], the current flows are 21.3 cubic feet per second. The historical low for July 22 is from 1980 when it was 60.0. The flows of the Rio Grande through Albuquerque is controlled by the Cochiti Dam, about 50 miles upriver. The dam is currently at 42 feet full[2], and is currently discharging about 300 cubic feet per second[3] (and appears to run continuously). So in the 50 miles between Cochiti Dam and Alb, about 280 cfs are being lost.
Maybe this is intentional diversion. But for what? I can only conceive of irrigation being the answer (but please call out other reasons). If it is just irrigation "intentionally" causing the river to run dry, that seems....really bad.
Given Cochiti Lake's low level, it won't be long before you can't irrigate those crops, so even the "use" of the water will be wasted. (Perhaps the worst outcome would be to intentionally divert the water to grow crops, but to run out of water before the crops grow fully. Then you've wasted the water and gotten nothing for it.)
[1] https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nm/nwis/uv?site_no=08330000 https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nm/nwis/uv?site_no=08330000
[2] https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nm/nwis/uv/?site_no=08317300&PARAmeter_cd=00065,00060 https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nm/nwis/uv/?site_no=08317300&PARA...
[3] https://waterdata.usgs.gov/usa/nwis/uv?08317400 https://waterdata.usgs.gov/usa/nwis/uv?08317400
- DougMellon 4y agoGoogle map of the area: https://www.google.com/maps/@35.5700851,-106.3533147,10454m/data=!3m1!1e3 https://www.google.com/maps/@35.5700851,-106.3533147,10454m/...
- ccooffee 4y agoOof! It is irrigated agriculture. :( Thanks for the link, didn't think of that.