> I feel like it's at least flirting with classical feature engineering I, for one, would welcome more of a bridge between intentional human engineering and ma

> I feel like it's at least flirting with classical feature engineering I, for one, would welcome more of a bridge between intentional human engineering and machine learning. Right now we have inscrutable billion-node language processing models that cause endless arguments about whether they actually know English or not, but don't actually integrate well with anything humans are actually doing. I'd love to see AI get mixed more fluently with manual solutions. It's too either-or right now; the best solutions will come from a mix of smart engineers working seamlessly with focused AI.