I'm aware. It's difficult to have a causational discussion with someone continually using correlational evidence. If I say with "provide a reason why Elon is n

I'm aware. It's difficult to have a causational discussion with someone continually using correlational evidence. If I say with "provide a reason why Elon is necessary to the success of the company", and you respond with "Look at the success of these two companies he led" that's completely tangential to the question. So in exchange for "doing better" answer a simple question for me: What specific actions did Elon take that led to the success of Tesla and/or SpaceX? I've provided several specific actions that were to the detriment of Tesla, so it should be straightforward to do the inverse.