2 ms·
This really depends on what you mean by "modern statically typed language". If you mean something like Haskell, I agree with you but there are too many other di
by tikhonj 15y ago
This really depends on what you mean by "modern statically typed language". If you mean something like Haskell, I agree with you but there are too many other differences to make Haskell and Ruby comparable. If you mean Java, then I'm not sure it prevents that many problems, but it does make developers less productive. If you mean something else (C#? Scala? F#? C++?) then I don't have enough experience to comment.
- chc 15y agoHow about just OCaml? It's much closer to Ruby than Haskell is, but it still gets the null-free H/M type safety.