> Not sure there's evidence there. I bet if you look over the vast majority of commit messages you will find that they're "lol fuck" or "whoops". Yeah the Linu

> Not sure there's evidence there. I bet if you look over the vast majority of commit messages you will find that they're "lol fuck" or "whoops". Yeah the Linux Kernel tree is _littered_ with those, it's a real pain /s. To be more serious, any workflow that's a tiny bit serious about technical debt will plain reject a PR that's littered with those. I have no problem with rejecting a PR with obvious commits like those. In a professional setting it's vital to keep codebases manageable, especially if those are in the tens. > The reality is that developers convey intent through pull requests and rarely go through a commit log. Not really. Pull request are usually a 1:1 mapping with an user story / ticket id / bug id, etc. They might require multiple changes in multiple places with their own reasoning.