3 ms·
The difference between a pay cut and a stock restriction is that pay is regular and vesting is not. Let's say you renegotiate down 50% like you suggested. That
by smokinn 15y ago
The difference between a pay cut and a stock restriction is that pay is regular and vesting is not.
Let's say you renegotiate down 50% like you suggested. That means from now on you make 50% and before you made 100%.
A vesting schedule though almost always accelerates towards the end. So if you renegotiate down 50% towards the end you may in fact be likely losing 75% or more. That's the problem with renegotiating stock grants/options, you likely still have a large amount left unvested and you put in all the hours and work beforehand with the promise that loyalty would be rewarded over time.
- harryh 15y ago> A vesting schedule though almost always accelerates towards the end. Really? That's hasn't been my experience. In every situation I've seen (or even heard of) vesting has been on a regular schedule with the exception of a cliff at the beginning of employment (generally 1 year). If the zynga situation involves people who have not yet reached their 1 year cliff the skeeziness factor would go WAY UP imho.