3 ms·
Except it IS unreliable, even with citations. Wikipedia is straight up garbage. Just one very recent example: https://www.engadget.com/chinese-wikipedia-editor
by groffee 4y ago
Except it IS unreliable, even with citations. Wikipedia is straight up garbage.
Just one very recent example: https://www.engadget.com/chinese-wikipedia-editor-fake-russian-medieval-history-122001604.html https://www.engadget.com/chinese-wikipedia-editor-fake-russi...
- uberman 4y agoI was just going to dig that link up as well.
- groffee 4y agoGreat minds!
- TheresNoTime 4y agoMaybe I need to add a section (in bold, flashing red text?) reiterating that you need to read the citations and not rely on the content? This recent example is awful, yes, but relied heavily on a Wikipedia project which has less strict referencing rules, and was consumed by people who didn't take the time to fact-check — we're about on par with Encyclopedia Britannica (ref: https://www.nature.com/articles/438900a https://www.nature.com/articles/438900a)