4 ms·
Not OP. No affiliation etc.. "since they might file for legal damages" On what grounds would their case not be thrown out immediately? Regardless of how well
by InspClouseau 4y ago
Not OP. No affiliation etc..
"since they might file for legal damages"
On what grounds would their case not be thrown out immediately? Regardless of how well known their lawyer is. Also, the agency might as well close up shop if they sue as they(incl. CEO & most staff) would never be hired again as agency or individuals given the whole nature of the internet.
from https://www.nbcnews.com/business/consumer/yes-you-can-post-negative-online-review-says-congress-n693001 https://www.nbcnews.com/business/consumer/yes-you-can-post-n...
> Congress has reaffirmed your right to post truthful negative reviews about a hotel, restaurant, or service — even if you signed an agreement
OP could easily name company and CEOs real name and still be legally sound & protected.
Stop scaremongering please.
- O__________O 4y agoKeyword is “truthful” — not saying the OP is lying, but mistakes, misunderstandings, etc. happen all the time, especially in stressful situations. Further, winning in court is not free and anyone is legally allowed to bring lawsuit against another; they even have a name and laws against them in many jurisdictions: Strategic lawsuit against public participation https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_lawsuit_against_public_participation https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_lawsuit_against_pu... My point is OP given the situation should speak to an attorney. As for your points, they’re specific to the US, set of assumptions, etc — which you didn’t even clearly articulate in your comment and created what appears to be a throwaway account to respond to a single comment. Impressive.