> What's notable is that the entire article here never once refutes the most important finding of the original Lesne paper (Aβ56 can produce alzheimer's like sy

> What's notable is that the entire article here never once refutes the most important finding of the original Lesne paper (Aβ56 can produce alzheimer's like symptoms in rats). You refute a paper by showing that part of it is incorrect. The research sleuths have provided incredibly strong evidence that the very existence of Aβ56 is demonstrated (in the paper) by a sham line on the western blot. It's like somebody has demonstrated that a photo of a "ghost" is actually a double-exposed film, and you are stating "What's notable is that the entire article here never once refutes the most important finding of the original photo (that ghosts can haunt the waffle house)."