This is a trick question. How do you quantify quality of articles? How much new science they created? We can't know that yet. What they provided in term of soci

This is a trick question. How do you quantify quality of articles? How much new science they created? We can't know that yet. What they provided in term of societal impact? SameThey reproductibility, lot of chemistry and biology from the 50s turned out to be really wrong for example. I would still say that the average quality (in my field), chemistry is lower but just because there is a deluge of really low quality publishers and journals that have no ethics. But if you stay in the major journals of fields, the answer is radically different.