3 ms·
> isn't this how peer review is supposed to work? Someone makes a claim. The claim and the claimant are assessed. Generally, the claimant is irrelevant in pee
by pork 15y ago
> isn't this how peer review is supposed to work? Someone makes a claim. The claim and the claimant are assessed.
Generally, the claimant is irrelevant in peer review. That's a hard standard to hold up though.
- Joakal 15y agoGenerally, there's data to support the submission as well. The submission did not have the data (logs, bug reports, etc). So it's pretty much easy to disprove the rant as nothing more than a rant.