3 ms·
>Both seem problematic/inefficient to me, compared to having Uber being able to, for instance, reduce/offset their reportable taxable income to compensate for t
by Aerroon 4y ago
>Both seem problematic/inefficient to me, compared to having Uber being able to, for instance, reduce/offset their reportable taxable income to compensate for the cost of providing services to disabled customers.
And this is why the US tax code is a mile long with loopholes upon loopholes. It seems far more inefficient to me to get companies to play creative accounting than to give individuals some sum of money.
- wizofaus 4y agoPossibly, but there are surely fewer companies eligible for making such a claim than there are individuals. Depends how automated you can make it I guess. And while I'm not one to get overly upset if certain compensation schemes are slightly vulnerable to fraud, you still need to maintain public trust in such a system for it to have long term viability, and individual- based schemes are surely more expensive to police/regulate.