4 ms·
Because that question is practically impossible to answer. You can't extrapolate current circumstances and draw a conclusion from there. The best you can do is
by BlargMcLarg 4y ago
Because that question is practically impossible to answer. You can't extrapolate current circumstances and draw a conclusion from there. The best you can do is compare with other countries, disregard any non-related-yet-ultimately-significant and draw a fairly weak conclusion from there.
Most of those conclusions would not be in favor of cars, either. Especially not in light of environmental damage.
- cscurmudgeon 4y agoIt is not impossible. Car haters like to think it is impossible.
- BlargMcLarg 4y agoTry it. I assure you, almost any angle you take can be poked through. Cars shine in large, low density zones. For good reasons. Most anti-car people are not in favor of removing cars in these zones or removing cars altogether, so arguing here is moot. Other places, whether removing a large amount of cars is beneficial or detrimental is decided either by culture, or by reinvestment options. And then, you're still stuck only comparing rationalities, with actual numbers being far harder to judge.