You're splitting hairs about the colloquial usage of the word 'administration' in the American context. I meant 'governing body' in general, including the execu

You're splitting hairs about the colloquial usage of the word 'administration' in the American context. I meant 'governing body' in general, including the executive, the legislative and the judicial. I understand it's usually meant to represent only the executive. > I would argue anyone looking to any administration for solutions versus the legislators doesn't understand how the US government works. You latest 2 comments are prime examples of fallacies. You've started with the `Fallacy of relative privation` about what the 'real' problems are, ending with some sort of 'Ad hominem'. To your point about what the executive can do (although that's not what I meant), the executive has influence. The executive doesn't function in an isolated bubble and can 'drive' a solution to any systemic problem through the branches of the government.