4 ms·
Not quite, It was pointed out it was a cited article, you called the author into question, and was shown the author is credible. The only fallacies are coming
by Volpe 15y ago
Not quite, It was pointed out it was a cited article, you called the author into question, and was shown the author is credible.
The only fallacies are coming from your posts, not from the article in question... :\
- Udo 15y agoAs I said many times in this thread: I called the study's conclusions into question, not the author. > The only fallacies are coming from your posts, not from the article in question... :\ After fighting you guys for the last our without one single person agreeing with me, I'm inclined to say you're right. I should probably stop posting now. It wasn't my intention to upset anyone. I'm sorry.
- swombat 15y agoDon't be sorry. You haven't hurt anyone's feelings (and if you have, they were too fragile to survive long on HN). It's fine to defend your arguments and later realise you're wrong. That doesn't make you a lesser person - on the contrary, you're someone who now knows one more thing. That's good. If HN can do that more often, that's good.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- drumdance 15y ago> After fighting you guys... Competitive much? :)
- Udo 15y agoNo. That's why I quit this discussion.