> I don’t see how a computer racer that destroys human competition would make the game more entertaining Indeed that looks like the racing version of aimbots.

> I don’t see how a computer racer that destroys human competition would make the game more entertaining Indeed that looks like the racing version of aimbots. I remember a thread on HN before about AI in guys. A game developer said that at some point if you make enemies too smart, the game becomes more frustrating. "AI beats players at game X" is less often a practical advance (e.g. classic chess engines already beat casual/semi-serious players, what's the need to utterly "destroy" them, really?) and more often a media stunt aimed at impressing potential customers for more profitable uses.