4 ms·
IDK, this sounds like a solution looking for a problem. Whether the 3d renderings will become regular tools on-site, or not, IDK, IANAn engineer. However, I hav
by tunap 4y ago
IDK, this sounds like a solution looking for a problem. Whether the 3d renderings will become regular tools on-site, or not, IDK, IANAn engineer. However, I have never seen 3d models utilized beyond design, the conference room or as an on-site curiosity... mostly retail big-box & small manu, and the models I have seen are coarse and often omit critical minutiae. Blueprints have been, and should always be, readily available to provide exacting details to the experienced professional(not laymen) before & during the project, already. Lots of new ideas come & go, but the application of standard practices scales up quite well in commercial & industrial applications, more so than res, as coded requirements are scrutinized by more agents and are less likely to be curtailed in the name of ease, cost cutting, aesthetics or any other gains an inexperienced actor may wish for.
TLDR: I know 3D Modelling is very useful & meaningful for design & planning. On the site, however, there are already tested tools & standards that scale quite well.
- bumby 4y agoDesign blueprints do not have those types of exacting details. They try, but they’re almost always needed to be modified. That’s why, even after the design phase, they’re required to deliver “as-built” blueprints. 3D renderings are definitely becoming more common, but it seems like they’re often used only when in the customer defined SoW. Similar to energy modeling in my experience.