2 ms·
That's a great question ("What can they do?") and the answer is a lot. As you may or may not know, legislative bodies have a whip. The current Democratic Senat
by jmyeet 4y ago
That's a great question ("What can they do?") and the answer is a lot.
As you may or may not know, legislative bodies have a whip. The current Democratic Senate whip is Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL). The job of a whip is quite literally to whip votes. It is to get legislation passed. Betwen the whip and the Senate Majority Leader, Chuck Schumer (D-NY), they could:
1. Remove Manchin and Sinema from committee chairs;
2. Remove them from committees completely (eg Dianne Feinstein was effectively removed because she's basically a billion years old and senile);
3. Investigate the links between Manchin, his actions on the Energy Committee and his brother's coal company in West Virginia from which he personally profits.
The counterargument is that they'll switch sides and either join the Republicans or simply caucus with them to retake the majority (eg like Tom Daschle did with Jim Jeffords). Let them. You cannot allow people to hold you hostage like that. They probably won't either because currently they enjoy a disproportionate amount of power. As soon as the GOP doesn't need them, they'll just be relegated to being junior Senators with little to no power.
The Republicans unlike the Democrats know how to whip votes. Take the fascinating case of Madison Cawthorn who found himself the subject of an organized hit campaign after making off-the-cuff remarks about Republican sex parties (seriously). He got dragged into Kevin McCarthy's office and came out looking like he'd been physically beaten. The GOP primaried him and he lost. That's how you get your caucus to toe the line.
So Manchin and Sinema could (and should) be primaried.
Biden could create executive orders to advance his agenda. He's too much of an institutionalist to worry about separation of powers and doing anything "too divisive". You know who doesn't worry about that? Republicans. Republicans care about winning. Democrats care about fundraising off how terrible Republicans are.
Even if such executive orders are struck down by the Supreme Court as overreach then at least you tried.
Example: The Senate could raised the minimum wage to $15 as a budget reconciliation process. They didn't. Why? Respect for some outdated notion of norms, rules and procedures. You know what the Republicans did when faced with pushback from the Senate parliamentarian on passing Bush's tax cuts? They fired him and found someone else [1].
Remember that keeping Roe v. Wade enjoyed wide public support (eg 64% according to [2]; I've seen other figures as high as 70-75%). Even if legislation cannot pass you force politicians to put their vote on the record. Votes on the record matter. Hilary's support for the Iraq War came back to haunt her (in 2008, mostly).
[1]: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2001/05/08/key-senate-official-loses-job-in-dispute-with-gop/e2310021-0f14-4667-a261-54e6c033207c/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2001/05/08/k...
[2]: https://www.npr.org/2022/05/19/1099844097/abortion-polling-roe-v-wade-supreme-court-draft-opinion https://www.npr.org/2022/05/19/1099844097/abortion-polling-r...
- rayiner 4y ago> The counterargument is that they'll switch sides and either join the Republicans or simply caucus with them to retake the majority (eg like Tom Daschle did with Jim Jeffords). Let them. When Tom Daschle was Senate majority leader, Democrats held both Senate seats in South Dakota. Virtually all of Democrats' economic achievements of the 20th century were built with a coalition including socially conservative midwestern and southern voters. Obamacare was passed with the support of voters that went over to Trump in 2016 over social issues. If you kick those people out of the coalition, as Democrats have been doing, you're left with a party that can't actually muster the votes to deliver on their economic promises to working class voters. > Remember that keeping Roe v. Wade enjoyed wide public support (eg 64% according to [2]; I've seen other figures as high as 70-75%). The majority of Americans don't understand the actual legal effect of Roe. They also support a 15-week ban on elective abortions--like the Mississippi law in Dobbs--which was prohibited under Roe. https://www.wsj.com/articles/support-for-15-week-abortion-ban-outweighs-opposition-wsj-poll-finds-11648821601 https://www.wsj.com/articles/support-for-15-week-abortion-ba.... More importantly to this conversation, a big chunk of the people who support legalized abortion are Republicans. https://news.gallup.com/poll/246278/abortion-trends-party.aspx https://news.gallup.com/poll/246278/abortion-trends-party.as.... The 2010 Democratic coalition that enacted Obamacare included about 30% folks who identify as "pro life." Continuing to kick those folks out of the coalition is a great way to do exactly what Mitch McConnell wants.